Essential? I don’t think that word means what you think it means
I’m generally curious when I see something defined as a “Fashion Essential.” Essential to what? Clearly, suits are an “essential” if you work in a place that requires suits. More generally, belts are “essential” if you wear pants (save your complaints, suspender crowd). But beyond the basic essentials there’s a lot of gray area.
Forbes, for example, has a very interesting take. Examples of “essentials” include the following:
1. Kilgour suit, retail $8000
2. Hermes reversible belt, retail $500
3. Ferragamo Raul Lace Ups, retail $525
4. Rolex Submariner, retail $5400
Sorry, but to me many of these are “Fashion Aspirations.” The basic theme, though, is correct. Your wardrobe should have items such as a great suit, a great pair of shoes, a great timepiece. Even though Kilgour, for example, might be slightly out of reach, the message from this article is a good one.
To read more, visit Forbes
2 Responses to “Essential? I don’t think that word means what you think it means”
Leave a Reply




October 23rd, 2007 at 11:39 pm
as a lady that has narrowed the essential to approxmately 20 clothing items (not including accessories or shoes) I concur that the notion of the essential has become wickedly warped.
but there’s something wonderful about the wicked. a seemingly sweet chocolate cashmere sweater somehow makes a convincing argument as essential. Then I get home and realize it has swiped my credit card - such a beautiful, evil little thing.
February 14th, 2008 at 5:14 am
gambling and betting…
inclined meant gladly endorsement witty girth?…